<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechJive &#187; Amazing Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techjive.net/category/amazing-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techjive.net</link>
	<description>Making Tech Jive For You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:16:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>I Actually Said &#8216;Wow&#8217; About a Microsoft Product</title>
		<link>http://www.techjive.net/2007/06/22/i-actually-said-wow-about-a-microsoft-product/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techjive.net/2007/06/22/i-actually-said-wow-about-a-microsoft-product/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amazing Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjive.net/2007/06/22/i-actually-said-wow-about-a-microsoft-product/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m typically one of those who is underwhelmed by what Microsoft offers. There isn&#8217;t really anything &#8220;sexy&#8221; about Windows, Office, SharePoint, etc. There are two recent products that I&#8217;ve seen that actually make me interested in what Microsoft is doing &#8212; in more than just the how-are-they-screwing-up-now kind of way. The first is Surface. If [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m typically one of those who is underwhelmed by what Microsoft offers.  There isn&#8217;t really anything &#8220;sexy&#8221; about Windows, Office, SharePoint, etc.  There are two recent products that I&#8217;ve seen that actually make me interested in what Microsoft is doing &#8212; in more than just the how-are-they-screwing-up-now kind of way.</p>
<p>The first is <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/surface/">Surface</a>.  If you haven&#8217;t already heard of Surface you should spend <em>more</em> time in front of your computer and <em>less </em>time enjoying the summer weather (tongue firmly planted).  Surface is a multi-touch unit that seems to be the first real commercial product in the collaborative touch-screen market.  This is very similar to (if not a licensed version of) what Jeff Han has been <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKh1Rv0PlOQ">working on</a>.</p>
<p>Second is <a href="http://labs.live.com/photosynth/">Photosynth</a>.  From the main Photosynth page, &#8220;Our software takes a large collection of photos of a place or an object, analyzes them for similarities, and then displays the photos in a reconstructed <strong>three-dimensional space</strong>, showing you how each one relates to the next.&#8221;  One of the engineers working on Photosynth, Blaise Aguera y Arcas &#8212; like Jeff Han &#8212; did <a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/129">a presentation</a> at TED, which shows some of the power of Photosynth.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit of a cynic, so I sit here and say Microsoft probably licensed the Surface technology from Jeff Han, and the technology behind Photosynth &#8212; <a href="http://labs.live.com/Seadragon.aspx">Seadragon</a> &#8212; was the product of an acquisition, and not internally developed.  They don&#8217;t do the work, the license/acquire the work; that&#8217;s just Microsoft being Microsoft.  You can&#8217;t deny that the products are pretty sweet, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techjive.net/2007/06/22/i-actually-said-wow-about-a-microsoft-product/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMWare Fusion Unity</title>
		<link>http://www.techjive.net/2007/06/06/vmware-fusion-unity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techjive.net/2007/06/06/vmware-fusion-unity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amazing Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjive.net/2007/06/06/vmware-fusion-unity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have heard about Parallels for running a virtualized OS within Mac OS X (Intel) chances are you have heard about VMWare Fusion.  Parallels has a feature called Coherence that pulls the virtualized applications out of the &#8220;boxed in&#8221; interface, and allows them to &#8220;mingle&#8221; with the OS X apps.  VMWare obviously has picked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have heard about <a href="http://www.parallels.com/">Parallels</a> for running a virtualized OS within Mac OS X (Intel) chances are you have heard about <a href="http://www.vmware.com/whatsnew/macsignupform.html">VMWare Fusion</a>.  Parallels has a feature called <a href="http://www.parallels.com/products/coherence/">Coherence</a> that pulls the virtualized applications out of the &#8220;boxed in&#8221; interface, and allows them to &#8220;mingle&#8221; with the OS X apps.  VMWare obviously has picked up on this, taken a cue from Emeril, and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIApJMzGzDQ">kicked it up a huge notch</a> with Unity.  I can&#8217;t wait to try it out.</p>
<p>[HT <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/06/06/vmware-fusion-unity">TUAW</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techjive.net/2007/06/06/vmware-fusion-unity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MIT = Making Incredible Things</title>
		<link>http://www.techjive.net/2007/02/20/mit-making-incredible-things/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techjive.net/2007/02/20/mit-making-incredible-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amazing Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjive.net/2007/02/20/mit-making-incredible-things/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I hear the phrase &#8220;Researchers at MIT&#8230;&#8221; I know I&#8217;m about to read/hear about something that is potentially mind blowing. What I just saw at TreeHugger was along those lines. Researchers at MIT are building a prototype of a lightweight electric vehicle that can be cheaply mass-produced, rented by commuters under a shared-use business [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I hear the phrase &#8220;Researchers at MIT&#8230;&#8221; I know I&#8217;m about to read/hear about something that is potentially mind blowing.  What I just saw at <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/02/mits_stackable.php">TreeHugger</a> was along those lines.</p>
<blockquote><p>Researchers at MIT are building a prototype of a lightweight electric vehicle that can be cheaply mass-produced, rented by commuters under a shared-use business model, and folded and stacked like grocery carts at subway stations or other central sites.</p></blockquote>
<p>If I lived in a major metropolitan area like NYC, Boston, or DC I would be one of the first customers to sign-up for the envisioned rental service.  As it is right now, I&#8217;d consider owning one of them.  I&#8217;ve got a 5-10 minute drive to work, and fitting that in the garage would be a breeze (even with all the clutter).  Futuristic cars are fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techjive.net/2007/02/20/mit-making-incredible-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
